wen its more than wat u can take/accept/tolerate... oh well u can def ponder more on it and give wierd vivid interpretations.. but its one of those expressions, the beauty of which lies in it being extremely trivial and the very fact that its said with the least of thought wenever u feellike... so lets jus leave it there :P
I fully concur with ash, whatever she(?) said. The depth to which she (again a (?))has analyzed the question, and answered it to the best of her (cliched I know, but here it goes: (?)) knowledge itself shows that it is a question one needs to ponder about from time to time, to dwell upon in those moments of solace and tranquility. She (definitely cliched: (?)) talks about tolerance, which is a virtue. This brings us to another question: Are weird things vivid and vivid things weird? And another: How weird is weird, exactly? Yet another: How vivid is vivid? And so on: How trivial is trivial? Stop me, someone: How much fact is actually fact? Here I go: How less is less? How cool is cool? How hot is hot? How extreme is extreme? How much of a point is a point? How big is big and how small is small? How tall is tall and how short is short? How beautiful is beautiful and how handsome is handsome? How awesome is awesome and how lame is lame? How long is long? How cliched is cliche? How much pain is pain? How are you after reading this?
Now, isn't this a bit too much??
ps: I hope you will continue to write such interesting pieces! :P ..
And in reply to your question, really, hon, if they start collecting such questions and compiled their answers and made a booklet out of it and distributed it around, why, no more questions! Now the fact that they haven't done that means a) no answers or b)top secret! Either way, tough luck, kid!
12 comments:
15 Bottles.. :D
wen its more than wat u can take/accept/tolerate... oh well u can def ponder more on it and give wierd vivid interpretations.. but its one of those expressions, the beauty of which lies in it being extremely trivial and the very fact that its said with the least of thought wenever u feellike... so lets jus leave it there :P
err.. whats ur point ash? a simple ans wudve sufficed!
oh well i dont hav an ans btw
I fully concur with ash, whatever she(?) said. The depth to which she (again a (?))has analyzed the question, and answered it to the best of her (cliched I know, but here it goes: (?)) knowledge itself shows that it is a question one needs to ponder about from time to time, to dwell upon in those moments of solace and tranquility. She (definitely cliched: (?)) talks about tolerance, which is a virtue. This brings us to another question: Are weird things vivid and vivid things weird? And another: How weird is weird, exactly? Yet another: How vivid is vivid? And so on: How trivial is trivial? Stop me, someone: How much fact is actually fact? Here I go: How less is less? How cool is cool? How hot is hot? How extreme is extreme? How much of a point is a point? How big is big and how small is small? How tall is tall and how short is short? How beautiful is beautiful and how handsome is handsome? How awesome is awesome and how lame is lame? How long is long? How cliched is cliche? How much pain is pain? How are you after reading this?
Now, isn't this a bit too much??
ps: I hope you will continue to write such interesting pieces! :P ..
what a load of crap that was! Ashwin =she(?) was damnnnn funny though! Thanks :P
ROTFL
And in reply to your question, really, hon, if they start collecting such questions and compiled their answers and made a booklet out of it and distributed it around, why, no more questions! Now the fact that they haven't done that means a) no answers or b)top secret! Either way, tough luck, kid!
LOL @ naren
Sol:
Lim (How much)
How->too
= Too much
dont complain, im supposed to be an engineer :-\
trust oink to come up with something like that!
juluri got it in rite dirction ;)it varies though.. knw it urself..
www.alcoholscreening.org
ok.. naren..u wud wanan restructure ur post now that u know who ash(win) is.. :P ..
and oink.. hmm... come again...?@#!??@#?..
cheers juluri.. u had a point there.. :P.. i think its the best reply to wtfish atleast.. lol...
and vidya... pls read it again... if u still dont get it.. lets gtalk :P
Post a Comment